One of the hardest things I sometimes have to tell an experienced professional is:
"We don't need all of this."
Not because the experience doesn't matter.
It does.
The difficulty is that a CV which tries to hold every year of a long career in equal detail tends to make no individual part of that career particularly legible. The reader ends up with a record rather than a narrative. And a record, however impressive, rarely makes a compelling case.
What length actually signals
I get asked about CV length quite often. Two pages, three pages, four — there are strong opinions on all sides, and most of them are presented as universal rules.
My honest view is that length should be driven by relevance, not by an arbitrary ceiling. A two-page CV that leaves out the most significant parts of someone's career is not better than a three-page CV that tells the story clearly. And a four-page CV that covers everything in equal detail, including training courses from 2007, is not giving the reader what they need.
What length actually signals is editorial judgement. A CV that has been carefully curated — where it is obvious that someone has made decisions about what to include and what to step back from — reads as the work of a professional who understands what is relevant. A CV that includes everything tends to suggest the opposite.
For most senior professionals with fifteen to twenty-five years of experience, two to three pages is a reasonable working range. But the page count is an output of the curation process, not a target to write toward.
Recency and relevance are not always the same thing
The general principle in CV writing is that recent experience matters more than older experience. This is mostly true, and the most recent two or three roles should typically receive the most space and detail.
But "recent" and "relevant" are not synonyms. I have worked with professionals whose most significant achievement — a transformation they led, a market they opened, a business they built — happened seven or eight years ago. That experience is older, but it is not less relevant. Treating it as a brief footnote because it falls outside a five-year window would be a mistake.
The test is relevance to the target role, not proximity to today's date. Older experience that directly supports your case for a specific kind of role should be represented with enough detail to make that case. Experience that no longer speaks to where you are headed can be summarised more briefly.
What to do with early career roles
For most executives with twenty or more years of experience, the roles from the first five to eight years of their career no longer need individual bullet points. They happened, they matter as part of the arc, and they can usually be acknowledged briefly — organisation, title, dates — without taking up the space that more senior roles deserve.
There are exceptions. If an early role established credentials that are genuinely unusual or directly relevant — specialist technical expertise, a particular sector, an unusual geographic experience — that might warrant a sentence or two. The question is always whether including the detail adds to the case you are making, or simply adds to the length.
Training courses and qualifications: a practical filter
This is an area where experience accumulates in a way that can create real clutter on a CV over a long career. Most senior professionals have completed dozens of courses, workshops, certifications, and short programmes across two decades. Some of these are genuinely significant. Many are not.
A practical filter: if a qualification is a formal professional credential that is still current and recognised in your field, it stays. If it is a short online course from several years ago that no longer reflects your seniority, it can come out.
The presence of dated, low-level training in a senior CV can inadvertently signal something unintended — that the document has not been reviewed recently, or that there is a gap in more substantive credentials. Removing it is usually the right call.
Progression within one Qatar organisation
Many professionals who have built long careers in Qatar have done so largely within one or two organisations. That depth of experience is something, not something to apologise for. But it needs to be presented in a way that makes the progression legible.
If you joined an organisation fifteen years ago and have held four or five increasingly senior roles within it, that story — of earned trust, expanding scope, and deepening contribution — is actually a strong one. The challenge is presenting it as a series of distinct chapters, each with its own opening scope, its own outcomes, and a clear sense of what changed because you were there, rather than letting the roles blur into a single continuous block of bullet points under one employer heading.
The detail is almost always there in the career. The work is making it visible on the page.
The underlying principle
Twenty years of experience should make a professional story richer, not harder to understand.
If a long career has produced a CV that feels overwhelming — dense with responsibilities, difficult to navigate, unclear about what the most important chapters were — the issue is not the career. It is the absence of curation.
The decisions about what to include, what to step back from, and what deserves real space are editorial decisions. They are also some of the most significant decisions in the CV development process, because they shape what a reader takes away after eight or ten seconds on the page.
A well-curated CV with twenty years of strong experience tells a story. An uncurated one from the same career tends to produce a record that nobody quite finishes reading.
Key Takeaways
- CV length should follow relevance, not a universal rule. Two to three pages is a reasonable working range for most senior professionals.
- Older experience that directly supports your case for a target role deserves real space, even if it sits outside a five-year window.
- Long tenure within one organisation should read as a story of progression and earned trust, not a single undifferentiated block of experience.
- Outdated training courses and low-level certifications should generally be removed from senior CVs.
- Twenty years of experience should make a professional story richer, not harder to understand. Curation is the work that makes that possible.
Related Insights
Executive CV Writing in Qatar: What Senior Leaders Need to Get Right → From Responsibilities to Business Impact: Writing Executive Achievements That Matter → Why Strong Executive CVs Still Struggle With Applicant Tracking Systems → You Have the Experience. So Why Aren't You Getting Interviews in Qatar? →
Not sure what should stay and what should go?
If you would like to think through how your career history should be curated and presented, you can start a conversation with Executive Narrative GCC.
Start a Conversation →